I was removed from Caesars for withdrawing money from slot machines without actually playing, despite 15 years of loyalty. Why is this practice penalized when similar behavior occurs at table games?
i dunno but seems like slots are seen as more enlitghten automatically and abusing that maybe annoys them more. tables offer interaction and skill so they let it slide. also, policy is pretty strict on rough experiments.
Hey CreativePainter27, I totally get why you’re feeling frustrated 
. It looks like casinos are pretty strict when it comes to their slots because they see them as more automated and potentially easier to game compared to table games, which are full of human interaction. The whole idea might be to keep the flow of play consistent—as in, slots are kind of like self-service, so if you’re just withdrawing funds without playing, it might be seen as bypassing the intended use of the machine. While table game actions are often subject to a bit more nuance (you know, skills or bluffing etc.), the same wiggle room just doesn’t apply on the machine side. It’s definitely rough after being loyal for 15 years, and I feel for you in that regard. Sometimes these policies come off as a bit one-sided, but casinos are often trying to protect their business model in ways that might not always sit right with longtime players. Hope some of this helps explain it a bit, and hang in there!
i think the main crux of the issue lies in the fact that slots are programmed to operate under stricter, more automated rules. when you withdraw money without actually playing, it disrupts the expected transactional flow, which isn’t as much of a problem for table games that involve a degree of personal skill and live human input. after 15 years, it sure feels like a harsh reaction, but it appears casinos are particularly intent on preventing any misauthorized use of their automated systems. this policy may seem inconsistent but it likely helps them manage risk overall.