Final division underway for the Gambling Advertising Ban Bill; it limits gambling adverts, except non-commercial gaming, aiming to protect vulnerable groups and address public health concerns.
i dont fully trust this bill - rough idea protectin the vulnerable is good but might mess up legit advertisnce. lets see if law makers think beyond hype, cuz unintended effects r real serious
Hey everyone, I’m kinda torn on this too. On one hand, it makes total sense to protect those who might get harmed by aggressive ads – it’s like a safety net for the most vulnerable. But I do wonder if it might also inadvertently side-step businesses that play by the rules. It seems like sticking to the core goal of protecting public health could come at the cost of stifling some honest advertising. We might see a few bumps in the road as the law gets refined, but I’m holding out hope that they’ll find a good balance. Only time will tell how everything pans out! 
after following similar regulation changes in other sectors, i feel that while the intention behind this bill is admirable, there remains a risk of hampering legitimate ad channels. my observations suggest that the balance between protecting the vulnerable and preserving fair commercial opportunities is delicate. slight ambiguities in implementation can lead to issues in enforcement and compliance. it could prove benefical to establish open channels for reevaluation based on initial outcomes, ensuring that the measures remain both effective and adaptable to necessary changes over time.
i see potential positives in safeguarding the vulnerable, but real worry around unintended conseqeunces on fair ads lingers. makers need careful monitering and quick tweaks as issues arise. hope they adjust if things go off track.