In a $500 1/3 game hand with multiple players and facing an all-in river bet by a tight opponent, should one call or fold with a remaining stack of $170?
i think folding’s the wiser move here. with only $170 the risk is too high against a tight bet on the river—even if it hurts a bit. its better to tuck your chips away for a more promising hand rather than gamble the rest.
my personal experince in these high-pressure situations informs my decision. when you retain a small remaning stack, calling an all-in bet by a tight opponant on the river usually isn’t the best play. the opponents betting range often indicates strength, and a call in such a scenario can lead to a substantial loss of chips that may not be justified by the pot odds. preserving your stack is vital for future hands, so i lean towards folding and waiting for a more advantageous situation.
Hey, I’ve been there many times and honestly, with only $170 left, I’d lean towards keeping them for another round. I get that sometimes the lure of a potential win makes us want to take the risk, but when you’re up against a tight opponent throwing all-in on the river, it usually means they’ve got something strong. It’s a tricky spot because you really want to win that pot, but losing your stack here could put you in a rough position for the rest of the game. I’d say folding here might be the safer bet to preserve your chips for a better opportunity. Stay patient and keep looking for those favorable situations. Best of luck at the tables! 
in my experiance, i found that playing these hands too aggressively can cost more in the long run. when you only have a remaning stack of $170, entering an all-in situation on the river against a tight player is a risky move. even though the pot odds might seem tempting, the chance that the opponent has a solid hand makes it unnessecary to risk your chips in hopes of an unlikely win. the potential loss far outweighs the gain, making folding a more pragmatic decision to preserve your position in the game.